How US drought damaged economy as well as crops
















WASHINGTON (AP) — The worst drought in decades didn’t just shrivel corn and soybeans. It shrank economic growth too.


The government said Friday that the U.S. economy grew at a modest 2 percent annual rate from July through September. And the crop-killing drought reduced growth by 0.4 percentage points.












That means normal weather would have lifted economic growth to 2.4 percent for the quarter, the Commerce Department said.


Below are questions and answers about the drought and its effect on gross domestic product. GDP is the broadest measure of the economy.


Q: How severe was the drought?


A: The dry spell that hit the Midwest and Great Plains last summer was the worst since the 1950s. It covered 80 percent of U.S. farmland. The drought hit hardest in July, a critical time for corn and other crops. Corn production is expected to drop more than 13 percent in the 2012-2013 growing season. Soybean production will likely fall 8 percent. Cattle, sheep and pig farmers are getting hit, too: The cost of feed is rising, and pastures have withered in the heat.


Q: How did the drought reduce economic growth?


A: Mainly by reducing crop supplies. Smaller supplies cut growth by 0.17 percent point from April to June and by 0.42 percentage point from July through September. Jeet Dutta, a senior economist at Moody’s Analytics, says he thinks the worst is over. He expects the drought’s impact on growth to diminish to 0.1 percentage point in the final three months of 2012.


Q: Does the economic damage go beyond the farm?


A: Yes, because GDP figures don’t capture, for example, higher food prices that can follow a drought. And farmers hit by a drought typically cut back on purchases of farm equipment, vehicles and other goods. That can hurt merchants in farm country and damage that part of the economy. Ernie Goss, an economics professor at Creighton University in Omaha, says Midwest merchants are expecting a weak holiday season in part because farmers have curtailed their spending. And the drought led to lower water levels in the Mississippi River that stranded barges, causing costly shipping delays.


Q: How does the economic damage from droughts compare with the damage from other natural disasters?


A: Hurricanes and earthquakes can reduce economic growth by disrupting production and consumer spending. But once the earth has stopped shaking and the winds have died down, communities can rebuild, boosted by insurance payouts and federal aid. Reconstruction can help the overall economy. By contrast, crops killed by drought can’t be recovered. “It’s a one-shot-a-year production practice for corn and soybeans,” said Todd Davis, an economist at the American Farm Bureau Federation.


Q: Have farmers’ incomes suffered?


A: Despite the drought, the U.S. Agriculture Department expects farm incomes to hit $ 122 billion this year, highest since 1973 when adjusted for inflation. They’ve benefited from higher prices for their crops and livestock. And government-subsidized crop insurance helps cushion the damage. Congress has been promoting crop insurance since the 1990s, notes economist Mekael Teshome of the PNC Financial Services Group.


Q: What is the effect on American consumers?


A: Prices for corn and soybeans in commodity markets have probably just about peaked, PNC says. But it will take three to six months for higher food prices to hit consumers, says Dutta of Moody’s. Prices will likely rise sharply by mid-2013, he says.


___


AP Business Writer Jim Suhr in St. Louis contributed to this report.


Economy News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

New York man who sued Facebook faces criminal charges
















(Reuters) – A New York man was arrested Friday on charges he forged documents in a multibillion-dollar scheme to defraud Facebook Inc and its chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, through a lawsuit claiming a huge ownership stake in the Internet company.


Paul Ceglia, 39, a one-time wood pellet salesman from Wellsville, New York, was charged with mail and wire fraud over what federal prosecutors and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service said was fabricated evidence to support his claim to a large stake in Facebook through a 2003 deal with Zuckerberg.












Ceglia’s accusations against Zuckerberg had marked a bizarre twist to Facebook’s march toward its highly anticipated initial public offering in May. Facebook’s origins were also the focus of a separate legal challenge by Zuckerberg’s Harvard University classmates, the twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, in a saga chronicled in the 2010 film, “The Social Network.”


Ceglia sued the Silicon Valley company and its chief executive in 2010, claiming that a 2003 contract he signed with Zuckerberg entitled him to a stake in the social media network. Zuckerberg had done programming work for Ceglia‘s company, StreetFax.com, while at Harvard University.


This past March, as part of that case, Facebook attorneys released emails sent by Zuckerberg to show Ceglia’s claims were false. The attorneys cited work by forensic experts who found that Ceglia had typed text into a Microsoft Word document and declared it was the text of emails with Zuckerberg.


Ceglia sought “a quick pay day based on a blatant forgery,” U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan said in a statement announcing the criminal charges. “Dressing up a fraud as a lawsuit does not immunize you from prosecution.”


A lawyer for Ceglia could not immediately be reached for comment.


“Ceglia used the federal court system to perpetuate his fraud and will now be held accountable for his criminal scheme,” Orin Snyder, a partner at law firm Gibson Dunn who is representing Facebook and Zuckerberg in the civil case, said in a statement.


PARTNERSHIP CLAIMS


In his lawsuit, filed in federal court in Buffalo, New York, Ceglia had claimed that Zuckerberg shared his plans for a social networking site with him while working at StreetFax. He contended that their contract granted him part ownership in Zuckerberg’s project in exchange for a $ 1,000 investment.


To build his case, Ceglia submitted what he said were emails from Zuckerberg that proved the pair had discussed the project that would eventually become Facebook.


But Zuckerberg said he had not even conceived of the idea for Facebook until December 2003, and submitted his own emails to prove his version of the timeline.


Ceglia went through a string of lawyers from prominent firms, including DLA Piper and Milberg, who worked with him on the case but later withdrew.


Ceglia was arrested at his home on Friday morning and appeared in federal court in Buffalo in the afternoon. In the hearing, a federal judge set bail at $ 21,000 and stayed the bail order until Monday at noon to give prosecutors a chance to appeal it, authorities said.


Each of the charges against him carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.


Investigators for the Postal Inspection Service, which is conducting the probe, made the arrest following Ceglia’s return to the United States this week after spending time out of the country, according to a source familiar with the matter who was not authorized to speak publicly on the case.


The judge in Friday’s hearing ordered Ceglia and his family to surrender their travel documents.


Separately on Friday, Massachusetts fined Citigroup Inc $ 2 million to settle charges that two bank analysts improperly released confidential information about Facebook’s financials before the technology company went public.


The case is USA v. Paul Ceglia, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.


(Additional reporting by Nate Raymond; editing by Martha Graybow, Bernadette Baum and Matthew Lewis)


Internet News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Liz Taylor tops list of highest earning dead celebrities
















NEW YORK (Reuters) – Elizabeth Taylor surpassed Michael Jackson as the highest-earning dead celebrity in the past year, with her estate pulling in $ 210 million, much of it from the auction of her jewels, costumes and artwork, Forbes said on Wednesday.


Jackson, who died in 2009, dropped into second place with earnings of $ 145 million, followed by Elvis Presley with $ 55 million.












In addition to the Taylor auction, which totaled $ 184 million, the actress, who passed away in 2011 at the age of 79, also earned $ 75 million from sales of her top selling perfume White Diamonds.


“The rest of the money came from property sales and residuals from Taylor’s movies,” according to Forbes. “After ‘Cleopatra,’ the star smartly negotiated a 10 percent ownership in each of her films.”


Although Taylor bumped Jackson from the top spot, Forbes said the pop star is likely to regain it next year due to steady revenues from music sales and other ventures.


Cartoonist Charles Schulz, who created the Peanuts comic strip, came in at No. 4 with earnings of $ 37 million, followed by reggae star Bob Marley with $ 17 million.


Forbes compiled the ranking by analyzing the dead celebrities’ earnings between October 2011-2012.


“We count money coming into the estate and we don’t deduct for how the estate handles it,” Forbes said.


Films stars and musicians dominated the list but Nobel-prize winning physicist Albert Einstein tied with Marilyn Monroe for seventh place, with each earning $ 10 million.


The 13 dead celebrities on the list earned a total of $ 532.5 million.


The full list can be found at http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2012/1024_dead-celebrities.html


(Reporting by Patricia Reaney, Editing by Christine Kearney and Tim Dobbyn)


Celebrity News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..